Sunday, January 29, 2017

EWU’s TPA guidelines & CAL State Universities Expository Reading and Writing Course Template


“The best teachers are those that show you where to look but don't tell you what to see.”
- Alexandra K. Trenfor

For the third blog post, I looked at EWU’s edTPA guidelines, along with the reading and writing template from California State University. The EWU Guidelines are basic and straight-forward, however, the CSU Assignment Template includes every possible direction and guidance on how to implement reading and writing skills. The assignment template includes many ideas and specialized techniques to help the new teacher with effective instruction.  This is a resource that I will surely be accessing continuously during this learning phase and beyond.

California State University’s assignment template not only lists the ideas and techniques to teach students reading and writing, it also has covers ideas for assessments. “Viewed broadly, formative assessments can help teachers adjust their instruction and modify the climate of their classrooms while students can adjust tactics they use to learn” (Popham). I especially enjoy Appendix H, Pre-writing strategies that include: Brainstorming, Clustering and Mapping, Discussion, Freewriting, Informal Outlining, Questioning, Quick-writes and Scanning. These are all invaluable, captivating ways to get students to read and write.

Appendix D offers Vocabulary Development Activities. The Frayer model is just one out of many examples. This model allows students to: define the key concept, describe its attributes, compare and contrast it to other related concepts, provide examples of it, and explain why the examples are appropriate. The other valuable strategies in this appendix include self-assessment charts that students can view to see which words they have difficulty with and the teacher can also see where the student is struggling.

Appendix E includes: Using classroom discussion strategies to foster rhetorical literacies. The number of examples and strategies are numerous. Studies show that well organized classroom conversations can significantly enhance academic performance. Frequent opportunities to collaborate and converse with high-interest, real-world topics can get students talking. Such plentiful occasions for talk –about content, structure and rhetorical stance – cultivate students’ curiosity, motivation and engagement, develop their thinking through sharing ideas with others, and prepare them to participate fully in university-level academic work.

Appendix J is about Collaborative scoring of student writing. This is also a powerful tool for bringing an entire department together around the "topic of student writing and the best ways it can be fostered. When teachers see how a large number of students respond to a writing task and talk with other teachers about the writing, not only of their own students but of everyone else’s, it can strengthen a program." This is a superior idea, keeping in mind the way that students are learning. Teachers foremost attention should be on the way students are grasping the material. 


As I go through this document, I am astounded at all of the great opportunities for teaching and assessing, truly a wealth of information.  One of the most valuable charts in this piece of work is advising students on what they are learning and why. The following chart is one that I will post in my classroom.

  1. Where Am I Going?
  2. How Am I Going?
  3. Where to Next?

Teacher
Clarify and communicate learning goals and success criteria to students.
Create an instructional environment for tasks, activities, and discussions that generate evidence of learning.
Observe and analyze evidence of student performance and procedures that would improve it.
Give feedback to students that clarifies for them what they need to understand and/or do
to close the gap between current performance and learning goals.
Provide support for process-oriented and self- regulated learning.
Student
Understand the learning goals and the success criteria.
Gain a clear picture
of the gap between
what learning goals
are expected and what progress toward them has been achieved.
Using the feedback
they have received regarding their progress so far, envision their next challenge, plan steps to meet the challenge, and monitor progress toward learning goal.