Saturday, February 18, 2017

Tovani’s “I Read it, but I don’t get it”














I found it so refreshing to read Cris Tovani’s book, I read it, but I don’t get it. Ms. Tovani doesn’t pretend to have all the answers to reading problems, just some of them. She tells us through funny and heartwarming anecdotes, about her own learning and teaching experiences. Ms. Tovani wants to help students improve their reading comprehension, to make them excited to read further. Ms. Tovani explains that she too experienced trouble with reading in school. She worked hard to be a good student, but reading comprehension was a huge dilemma. The concept of “fake-reading” is something we all know about! By engaging our students with texts that are relevant and interesting, we can help them become avid readers.

This book is filled with real-life applications for those students who are having trouble with comprehension. Some readers can read the words, and not understand any of it. Ms. Tovani shows us ways to motivate the reader into finding those places that cause the disconnect and then addresses the issue. I love how Ms. Tovani shows examples of modeling by bringing in a current event that is disturbing, weird or shocking. The teacher makes a copy of the news report for each student, and a transparent copy to project on the board for the teacher. She then asks questions while the students make notes in the margin of their own copy. The students ask questions about the article, allowing for even more engagement on the topic. “Teaching Point: Good readers are curious about the world around them. Asking questions and wanting more information gives them a reason to read” (94). This is such a great tool, because the student is guided by the teacher’s modeling. She instructs them to ask questions, but to wait for the answers for the next day. This technique affords the student time to reflect about the article and the questions they want answered. By modeling what a successful reader does, these students will become independent readers of more complex texts.

Part 3 of I read it, but I don’t get it, is a section of Access Tools including: Double-Entry Diaries, Comprehension Constructors, and Coding Sheets. These are valuable strategies to engage any student with comprehending. I will be motivated to use these ideas in my future classroom, to help make life-long readers out of students.





Thursday, February 9, 2017

Duncan-Andrade and Morrell “Critical Pedagogy and Popular Culture in an Urban Secondary English Classroom”




“In order for critical pedagogy, dialogue, and thought to have real effects, they must advocate the message that all citizens, old and young, are equally entitled, if not equally empowered, to shape the society in which they live.” Henry Giroux



This article expounds on the notion that the ability to comprehend text is the most important goal of reading instruction, everything else builds upon this skill. Teachers want their “students to be able to present themselves powerfully and persuasively across multiple written genres as well as through formal and informal oral presentations” (4). Critical pedagogy theory means that we should teach students how to be aware of their own learning. We want them to recognize when someone is trying to dominate them through education. Teachers and students should be learning from one another and not just the “sage on the stage” mentality.

In 1971, Antonio Gramsci suggested that “the ultimate goal of a proletariat education is to help make students more critical consumers of all information that they encounter in their daily lives and to give them the skills to become more capable producers of counter-information” (7). I can’t think of anything more important to know how to do in life. This very skill can help in numerous arena’s, from a student’s own classroom, to their future job, to unfair practices at their child’s school. There are many instances that students will need to be able to think and act for themselves during their lifetime. It should be educators number one priority to help their students gain the life skills to change the world, or just their own situation. We live in a tough world, by making our students understand that there are injustices in the world, and that they can do something about those injustices, is a worthwhile purpose.

I appreciate the author’s sensitivity when deciding on literature to teach for their diverse classrooms. The teachers used “classroom units that coupled the study of film, newspapers, magazines, and music with the study of traditional novels, poems, and plays” (10). Opportunities were offered for students to study and incorporate their own every-day culture into classroom assignments. By doing this, these educators were displaying that they cared about what was important and relevant to these students lives. The result was that students were interested in learning.

Theory of critical pedagogy is mostly interested in asking questions that make students think deeper and more critically. School should be a place where teachers understand their students’ goals, passions and interests. If educators take the initiative and connect student interest to their teaching techniques, more students would be engaged.

Definition of Critical Pedagogy by Study.com
Critical pedagogy is based on the work by Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator, who was once imprisoned and then exiled as a traitor for his teaching methods which were used to teach illiterate adults. Critical pedagogy recognizes the influence that the lack of education has on the oppression of impoverished people. One of the primary goals of education is to help people develop critical consciousness. Critical consciousness is the ability to assess the political and social structures that exist and to empower people to question authority and speak out against injustices.







Critical Pedagogy at work thanks to:
 http://maljewari.blogspot.com/2013/03/how-does-critical-pedagogy-look-like-in.html 



Discourse

The teacher can either pose a question or an idea as students interact in conversation about the particular subject selected. A teacher can also pose a problem that exists in their community. The students learn about the idea as they interact in discourse with the teacher, members of community, and between students.

Guided by the Teacher

The teacher guides the students to the objective, that is what they are going to learn through the use of past events in history or current events that are occurring.   The activities selected by the teacher promote communication and allows the student to view other perspectives and incorporate real-word experiences.  However, the idea or concept they  learn is relevant in some way to the students. A possible event in history that impacted their community connected to a world event, similar to the video can be used in the lesson. 

Students' Create/Explore/Develop

The teacher allows the students to expand on the idea  or  point of view the teacher wants them to understand and reflect. This is similar to the exploration and evaluation of the 5 E model.  However, students do not use materials given by the teacher.  The  students input is based on what they think and particularly seeking the right or wrong answer is not the objective of the lesson.  Students should feel empowered in learning.  The outcome of the lesson depends on the students interest and effort

Here are four dimensions of critical pedagogy (Lewison,Flint, and Sluys, 2002) that can be applied in the classroom. 

1. Disrupting the commonplace
2. Interrogating multiple viewpoints
3. Focusing on social political issues
4. Taking action and promoting social justice


A Great Example of  incorporating Critical Pedagogy